<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Human-in-the-Loop on AioGeoLab | GEO优化实验室</title><link>https://aiogeolab.com/tags/human-in-the-loop/</link><description>Recent content in Human-in-the-Loop on AioGeoLab | GEO优化实验室</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.151.0</generator><language>zh</language><copyright>2025 TardiAI</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 07:11:51 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aiogeolab.com/tags/human-in-the-loop/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Human-in-the-loop不是一个开关，是一个设计决策丨人在Agent执行中的三个位置</title><link>https://aiogeolab.com/posts/tgje-123-where-do-you-stand-three-human-in-the-loop-positions-for-agent-execution/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://aiogeolab.com/posts/tgje-123-where-do-you-stand-three-human-in-the-loop-positions-for-agent-execution/</guid><description>&amp;#34;Human-in-the-loop&amp;#34;被说了很多，但很少有人说清楚：人应该站在执行链的哪个位置。全程监督、关键节点介入、事后审计——三种模式对应不同的风险承受和信任程度，不是哪种更好，是哪种更适合当前任务。本文拆解三种介入模式的设计逻辑，给出选择依据，以及一个最容易踩进去的判断错误。</description></item></channel></rss>